Home Green Environment Debate On Rebuilding NJ Beaches After Sandy To Intensify

Debate On Rebuilding NJ Beaches After Sandy To Intensify

Harvey Cedars, NJ

The average New Jersey beach is 30 to 40 feet narrower after Superstorm Sandy, according to a survey that is sure to intensify a long-running debate on whether federal dollars should be used to replenish stretches of sand that only a fraction of U.S. taxpayers use.

Harvey Cedars, NJ

Some of New Jersey’s famous beaches lost half their sand when Sandy slammed ashore in late October.  The shore town of Mantoloking, one of the hardest-hit communities, lost 150 feet of beach, said Stewart Farrell, director of Stockton College’s Coastal Research Center and a leading expert on beach erosion.  Routine storms tear up beaches in any season, and one prescription for protecting communities from storm surge has been to replenish beaches with sand pumped from offshore. Places with recently beefed-up beaches saw comparatively little damage, said Farrell.”  It really, really works,” Farrell said. “Where there was a federal beach fill in place, there was no major damage, no homes destroyed, no sand piles in the streets. Where there was no beach fill, water broke through the dunes.” The beach-replenishment projects have been controversial both for their expense and because waves continually wash away the new sand. The federal government picks up 65 percent of the cost, with the rest coming from state and local coffers.  How big the beaches are,  or whether there is a beach at all to go to,  is a crucial question that must be resolved before the summer tourism season.  The Jersey shore powers the state’s $35.5 billion tourism industry.

Photo Credit: John Vlahakis


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here